• 0 głosów - średnia: 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Kolejny gwóźdź do trumny żydowskiego bękarta!
#16

Tomash napisał(a):
aXe Rose napisał(a):Biblię traktuję jako bujdę, gdyż wystarczy porównać stary i nowy testament, by się przekonać, jak tendencyjnie one powstawały. To nie są księgi uniwersalne, dobre w każdym okresie. O ile jeszcze Nowy testament jest jeszcze w miarę, tak Starego po prostu nigdy nie potrafiłem zdzierżyć.

No ja na odwrót Big Grin ST fajnie się czyta(niezależnie czy o kompletna bujda czy nie)
Niewątpliwie ST to niezła "bajka", tylko że mnie zawsze wkurwiała maksymalnie jego niesprawiedliwość. Nie wiem, czy bóg jest, czy go nie ma, ale gdyby miał być taki jak w ST, to ja bym 100x wolał do piekła Tongue
[Obrazek: bustersMini.jpg]
Odpowiedz
#17

popieram przedmówcę Laughing
Taki strach odczuwa się patrząc w mrok i widząc tam coś, co przymierza się, by cię pożreć

[Obrazek: 482c918c35ffee755d8c200b0b956109.jpg]
Odpowiedz
#18

Wklej tu jeszcze fragmenty " Marszu Tytanów ..." , hahaha !
"Beyond scorn, lies and calumny, I still stand and watch you rot"
Meychna'ch
Odpowiedz
#19

Nuillnac napisał(a):Wklej tu jeszcze fragmenty " Marszu Tytanów ..." , hahaha !

you gottit

http://www.white-history.com


JESUS CHRIST - NO CONTEMPORARY EVIDENCE

The first source of information about the person who became known as Jesus Christ are the Gospels which make up the first four books of the Christian New Testament. As these works only appeared some 80 to 120 years after Christ's supposed death, there is thus no contemporary evidence showing the existence of Jesus Christ, an important but little known fact.

The person who was deified by Christianity to become the Son of God, is most probably a composite character based on the stories and myths surrounding several of the leaders of the Essenes, particularly the one whom the Essenes claimed had been killed and had risen from the dead, and whom they called the "Teacher of Righteousness."

The first time that the name Jesus Christ appears in any Roman records (and they were generally meticulous in record keeping) is the book The Jewish Wars, by Josephus, a Romanized Jew, who was commissioned to write a history of the Jewish rebellion (this excellent work is still available today).

Josephus' work was first published in 90 AD. In the book, Josephus makes mention of a small sect of Jews who claim to follow a messiah figure called Jesus, but the mention is brief and in passing.

In any event, by the time of Christ's alleged death (supposedly 33 AD) Christianity had very few followers, especially amongst the Jews themselves, who regarded the Christian philosophy as nothing but a reworking of the Essene cult, and did their best to silence it. It is therefore clear that Christianity, as a religion, originated from Jewish mythology.

SAUL ALIAS PAUL

One of the most zealous of these persecutors of the Essene ideology was a Jew by the name of Saul. At some stage, according to the Christian Bible, Saul experienced a vision and was himself converted to the cult that he had been persecuting. Saul then immediately changed his name to Paul and set off on long evangelistic tours of Asia Minor, Cyprus and Greece, attracting small bands of followers and writing proselytizing pieces along the way.

Returning to preach in Jerusalem, he was violently attacked by fellow Jews and was imprisoned for two years. Following an appeal to the Roman emperor he was transferred to Rome in 60 AD. Placed under house arrest, he was eventually beheaded by the Emperor Nero, who developed a particular hatred for the new cult.

Saul (Paul) however did much to create the groundwork for Christianity. Many of his writings were later taken to have been inspired by the Christian God and were taken up into the New Testament.

THE BIBLE CREATED

However, several other disputes over doctrine made the religious leaders at Nicaea realize that if some weighty final word on the outline of their belief was not forthcoming, the religion could splinter into factions. The problem was that there was no such manual or holy book in existence - the leaders then took it upon themselves to create such a book. For this purpose they turned to whatever texts they could find.

The books now contained in the Old Testament were largely oral before 300 BC, although some had been written down by Jewish rabbis. Through contact with Jews in Ptolemaic Egypt, King Ptolemy II of Philadelphus (285-246 BC) is credited with ordering the translation of the Jewish religious books into Greek.

The Christian version of the Old Testament was only established as a comprehensive work by the scribe Origen around 250 AD, and up until that time only loose translations of the Ptolemaic Greek work formed the basis of Christian teachings.

The origins of the New Testament are very vague. By the end of the first century AD, the writings of Saul/Paul (called the Pauline Epistles) consisting of letters to the various Christian communities in Asia Minor and Rome had been established as a collection of inspired works. The gospels which make up the first part of the New Testament only emerged after the writings of Saul/Paul had become well known, and long after his death.

This is evidenced by the fact that in Paul's writings there is no mention of any other new testament book or gospel, as well as the account of what Jesus did on the night he was "betrayed" (1: Cor. 11:23) which differs substantially from the Gospel version as recounted in the Matthew, Mark, Luke and John versions.

It is clear that if the four gospels were in existence at the time when Saul/Paul wrote his epistles (around the year 55 AD), he would have at least mentioned them, or very likely have even quoted from them. The earliest existent gospel consists of fragments of the Gospel of John, dating from about 100 AD, and which is in Greek.

By 200 AD, the Church had developed the New Testament in its present form, although still written in various languages, including Greek and Hebrew, apart from the Book of Revelations. Where this last chapter came from no-one knows for sure, but by the 4th Century it had been included in the New Testament anyway.

The compilation of the New Testament omitted several early Christian manuscripts which did not fit in with the other books. The most famous of these "left out" books is the Gospel of St. Thomas, probably because the events described therein are at quite some variance with the events described in the four more well known gospels.

The Council of Nicaea went a long way to formalizing the Bible as Christians know it today - all in an attempt to prevent the church from splitting again as it nearly did over the Arian controversy. In this attempt they were to fail, and some of the most grievous conflicts to come in Europe would be precisely over different interpretations of the Bible.
[Obrazek: sbo3s4.jpg]
Odpowiedz
#20

http://www.white-history.com/hwr17a.htm
[Obrazek: sbo3s4.jpg]
Odpowiedz
#21

KelThuz napisał(a):http://www.white-history.com/hwr17a.htm

racja...
Odpowiedz
#22

www.white-history.com to ogolnie swietna stronka, dzieki Kel za link...
"All that's left to say is: Farewell"
Odpowiedz
#23

ReTuRn napisał(a):www.white-history.com to ogolnie swietna stronka, dzieki Kel za link...

eeee, nie mówisz chyba poważnie? ta strona i jej autor, afrykanerski 'nordycysta' Arthur Kemp, to pośmiewisko całego intelektualnego świata poważnych nacjonalistów itp., ponieważ treść książki March of the Titans to nadaje się wyłącznie dla głupkowatych amerykańców - którzy uwierzą w bezpodstawne "dowody" istnienia nordyckiego Egiptu i mongolskich Hunów, którzy "zanieczyścili" rasę południowych Słowian. Litości...
Jedynie linki do źródeł naukowych, które Kemp znajduje, są warte poznania, choć on sam nie rozumie, o co w nich biega chyba. Nadal trzyma się prymitywnej pseudonauki, zamiast kompletnie zrewidować swój pogląd na mnóstwo spraw, i napisać książkę od nowa.
[Obrazek: sbo3s4.jpg]
Odpowiedz
#24

KelThuz napisał(a):
ReTuRn napisał(a):www.white-history.com to ogolnie swietna stronka, dzieki Kel za link...

eeee, nie mówisz chyba poważnie? ta strona i jej autor, afrykanerski 'nordycysta' Arthur Kemp, to pośmiewisko całego intelektualnego świata poważnych nacjonalistów itp., ponieważ treść książki March of the Titans to nadaje się wyłącznie dla głupkowatych amerykańców - którzy uwierzą w bezpodstawne "dowody" istnienia nordyckiego Egiptu i mongolskich Hunów, którzy "zanieczyścili" rasę południowych Słowian. Litości...
Jedynie linki do źródeł naukowych, które Kemp znajduje, są warte poznania, choć on sam nie rozumie, o co w nich biega chyba. Nadal trzyma się prymitywnej pseudonauki, zamiast kompletnie zrewidować swój pogląd na mnóstwo spraw, i napisać książkę od nowa.

ta strona o wizerunkach jest ok
nordycka rase mam w dupie ale fakty sie zgadzaja niektore...
ukrzyzowanie, mitra i motyw dziecka
Odpowiedz


Podobne wątki…
Wątek: / Autor Odpowiedzi: Wyświetleń: Ostatni post



Użytkownicy przeglądający ten wątek: 1 gości